The memory of Mahatma Gandhi today, in India is reduced to rituals. His ideals are forgotten and much of what he stood for is remembered only in parts and misunderstood. Many young people lifted on modern ideas wonder what wisdom there is in turning the other quarter if someone strikes you on one cheek. Similarly, there is no place for simplicity in one's life, when every person is opting for western life styles and thought process. In the proper care free money oriented perspective that pervades our life today, discuss morals and non-violence certainly seems out there of place.
Gandhian viewpoint is vast and includes many ideals. It is simple to consider any part of Gandhian thought and criticize it. Gandhi belonged to everyone, so there is no danger of any minority community reacting and issuing a death word on those who do this. Any two bit politician or journalist who wants to escape with it. It is perhaps a reflection on the sorry the politics and social problems that its icons can so easily be defiled without punishment.
But this easily answers the question about Gandhi's relevance today. If he was unnecessary, as many people are bound to say, UK essay writing
exactly why is he not forgotten like many other twentieth hundred years thinkers and leaders who remain buried in library books? Why does Gandhi evoke strong thoughts in those who criticize your pet? The answer is based on the universal relevance of Gandhian philosophy not only in the but all over the world. Many ideas come back to us all finding acceptability in the West; and Gandhism might also have to wait until it is discovered.
Inside an age when our bureaucrats cannot stand upward for their beliefs and crawl when asked to bend, it is difficult to think of one man - "a 50 percent naked fakir" - who could stand up against the might of the British Empire. The valor of one man who had been neither a dictator neither a politician can only be considered a cause of question. If the life in public life commanded only half the courage of the fakir, India may not be debating on the criminal-politician nexus today or the corruption that pervades the society.
There is no doubt that Gandhi was obviously a man ahead of his times. He foresaw many of the issues that we face today. In 1927 he wrote "a time is coming when those people who are in the mad dash today of multiplying their wants will retrace their steps and say, what have we done"?
Whenever we see around us, most of the modern problems of the world have arisen from senseless development. Industrialization and high tech. have come in such high quantities of waste that countries do not know very well what related to it. Nor do we know very well what to do with the huge quantities of arms that the world powers have collected. These days, the nuclear weapon says have collected deadly weapons capable of destroying the world several times over. If only a part of the money blocked in arms could be available to fight poverty and disease, the world would be an improved spot to live in.
Nevertheless the western system gows best on market demand. Thus, you will find a vested interest in keeping the demand still living even if it is for deadly weapons. Gandhi had foreseen this as early as 1980. He or she wrote in Hind Swaraj that modern civilization is a nine days amazing things, which may sink under its own weight. Gandhiji also advocated total disarmament. He wanted India to adopt "non-violence to the utmost extent possible" which would be India's factor to the establishment of any disarmed world. That Indian chose to go in the opposite way shows how strong the Western influences are.
Swaraj was not simple self rule, according to Gandhi. It also meant liberation from the system of governance imposed by the English on this country. This individual foresaw that independence world means only a change in the principles but the exploitative system would continue. When we see the state pushing for public works and other mega projects altogether disregard of the people's feelings we realize the facts of his fears.
What Gandhiji favored instead was decentralization of polity and economy. Centralized economy and planning, according to him, were dehumanizing and alien to the Indian native way of life and culture. The recognition of his idea by the government through Panchayati Raj is not only 50 percent hearted recognition of Gandhian thought, but has also come too late.
Gandhiji's views on are Federal government are also enlightening. The particular Westminister model that we get already been following was given by England, but Gandhi was opposed to it because it implied the presence of two classes the rulers and the reigned over. The British Parliament in accordance with him was a "sterile woman" because it could do anything with finality. Nor could its members act on their own but must obey the whip of their parties, reducing them to rubberized stamps. It absolutely was unfortunate that after independence India did not heed his advice. He also wanted to disband the Congress celebration which he knew comprised of selected leaders who were going to rule over the people just like the British.